Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 18:56

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

5 Drinks to Help You Debloat, According to Dietitians - EatingWell

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Former church in Northern Kentucky now a heavenly home for sale - WWMT

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What’s next?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

How are retailers finding success in offering "pre-tariff" sales promotions?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

The Universe's Missing Black Holes May Have Been Located - ScienceAlert

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Fastest Payout Online Casino: Lucky Creek Best of Instant Withdrawal Casinos - ACCESS Newswire

Thank you.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Thunder-Pacers: SGA, OKC rally to win Game 4 of NBA Finals - Al Jazeera

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Just in the last 5 years:

Scientists: We Built 'World's Smallest Violin' - Newser

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Can a twin flame runner be happy in a karmic relationship?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s AI hiring spree - The Verge